Using Claude to Clone Confluence in 16 Minutes
Day three. Another SaaS subscription, another Single Serving Application. I've now replaced Harvest (time tracking) and Trello (project management) with AI-generated clones. Today's target: Confluence -- Atlassian's knowledge management and wiki platform. Claude Opus 4.6 built a fully functional Confluence clone in 16 minutes, consuming 106,000 tokens. That's the fastest build yet -- down from 18 minutes for Harvest and 19 for Trello. The pattern is holding: requirements in, working application out, no human intervention needed.
Using Claude to Clone Trello in 20 Minutes
Last week I had Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.3-Codex race to build a Harvest clone. Claude won decisively. That experiment killed a $180/year SaaS subscription. Naturally, I started looking at my other subscriptions. Trello was next on the list. I've used it for years to manage personal projects, product roadmaps, and random ideas. It's a great product -- but it's also a multi-tenant, collaboration-heavy platform where I use maybe 20% of the features. A perfect candidate for a Single Serving Application. So I wrote a requirements document, handed it to Claude Opus 4.6, and walked away. 19 minutes and 137,000 tokens later, I had a fully functional Kanban board running on localhost.
Ephemeral Apps Are Almost Here
I recently built a Harvest clone in 18 minutes, a Trello clone in 19 minutes, and a Confluence clone in 16 minutes. All three were generated entirely by Claude Opus 4.6 from requirements documents. All run in Docker. All work.
Single Serving Applications - The Clones
I'm systematically replacing my SaaS subscriptions with Single Serving Applications -- purpose-built, AI-generated apps designed for an audience of one. Each clone is built by Claude Opus 4.6 from a requirements document, runs via Docker Compose, and costs essentially nothing to operate.
The Single Serving Application
I recently had two AI models build a complete Harvest clone in under 20 minutes. The winning version covered 97% of Harvest's features. I'm seriously considering canceling my $180/year subscription and using it instead. That experiment got me thinking about something bigger than one app replacement. We're entering an era where a competent engineer with an AI coding assistant can generate a fully functional web application from a requirements document in the time it takes to eat lunch. That changes the economics of software in a fundamental way.
